• Examples of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

    Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

    From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy through the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs for the Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to displace self-government and control over land and resources represents an important “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is really what happened once that space was recovered.

    The main topics this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the real history associated with the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of regarding the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks once the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, while the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power within the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse together with parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This research examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to create a narrative of Native agency in the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation and also the Evolving Community Identity into the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

    Sample 2: “Private Paths to Public Places: Local Actors in addition to development of National Parklands in the American South”

    This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the development of parklands throughout the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the us government utilizing the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders, an investigation of parklands when you look at the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the necessity of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but give attention to opposition into the imposition of new rules governing land in the face of some threat that is outside. Regardless of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the significance of local individuals when you look at the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples within the American South raise concerns about the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained curiosity about both nature preservation as well as in creating spaces for public recreation at the local level, and finds that the “private way to public parks” merits investigation that is further.

    Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks when you look at the American South” was subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

    Sample 3: Untitled

    Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature in regards to the Levellers and their role in the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and political thought. Typically, their push to increase the espousal and franchise of a theory of popular sovereignty happens to be central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they could make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to locate a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. In place of focusing on John Lilburne, often taken as the public face of the Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and a lot more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement when you look at the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i am hoping to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Even though the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a tolerant society and a secular state really should not be minimized but rather recognized as element of a more substantial debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to donate to the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

    Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study associated with First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

    Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have not only proliferated rapidly–they are becoming the expectation that is normative American society. When it comes to vast majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have resulted in no permanent memory sites together with sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the community therefore the nation could forget the tragedy and move on. All of this changed may 29, 1989 if the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial into the thirteen people killed in the”post that is infamous shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the scenario of Edmond so that you can understand just why it became the first memory site of the kind in United States history. I argue that the small town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities on the day of this shooting, along with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence of the unique kind of memory site. I also conduct a historiography associated with usage of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how it offers get to be the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society within the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate how the notable lack of communication between people active in the resume help Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of those cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising wide range of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

    Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The Quest for Postmortem Identity throughout the Pax Romana”

    “If you would like know who i will be, the clear answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription. The Romans dealt with death in a variety of ways which incorporated a selection of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as with the full case of this “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice for the distant past because of the fifth century. Burial first began to take hold within the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, with the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world would not talk about the practices of cremation and burial at length. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in as a type of burial vessels such as for instance urns and sarcophagi represented the actual only real location to look to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the Roman world. This paper analyzed a small corpus of these vessels to be able to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols to your fragments of text available associated with death in the world that is roman. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement brought on by an elevated desire on the section of Romans to preserve identity in death during and following the Pax Romana.

    Leave a reply →

Photostream